Intelligence Gathering

Not to embed further footnotes,* but there is a heirarchy of globalism that is a reality.  Not to resort to labelism, but it is not as easy as "heirarchy" or "globalism" or branching of powers, but is a matter of transparency, pragmatism and incrementalism.

* 1st two links inserted later.
[even later Re: The Cycle & "cross referencing"*(OW)** ]
** anacronistic asterisks/links

2-8-13 Circular Filing?
(Not exactly preemptive, but only partially CONtemporary[!])

Battle of Amendments?

Or Balance of Fittest ?

Related Flak [?]

[Reboot Reading List]
[No compunction or qualms with how others connect the dots ?]

This in no way* intends to imply that the amendments have any intention of being in any heirarchy, priority or clause.**

* nor weigh ?   [a Lean Forward, b  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (b), c, d Ghost of X-mas Passed. , e One Heckuva Day. , f, g It's Obama's Turn , h The Fighting Ill Lie Nigh! , i Social Darwinism 2.0[!] , j Now this is the ticket. , k Weird Google of the Day. , l Speaking of Bowls, m X & Y Chromo Somes]
** (s.c.) scroll click[Maslow, clause(b.s.), wits]
[Reading List, RE:VIEWING, Reading List (UC) ]

[Face the Music ! ? ! (cheer/leader/ship/?)]

Ditto Heads Unite!

Thanks to Rush Limbaugh (
[for those that don't know: Ditto Heads are Rush followers]
and FOX )we have a new 50 state strategy.
And it wouldn't be anywhere without Hillary.
[5-15-08: updated ]
The double-edged conspiracy actually works. Rush is not only covering for the "rats leaving the sinking ship" but in trying to get Hillary as the nominee, as the lighter of the two democratic candidates, gives us a more weighty candidate. Meaning do they really think that Hillary is easier to beat or just covering their bases if she wins? And do they really fear Obama as a candidate or do they think he would be the one to beat? In the end, the turnout is Confusionism. Not to be mistaken for confusing but more mama* nature and fusion. Maybe the con has backfired. But in the end there will be more registered voters, if they get counted.

Other sources: Is Limbaugh's Operation Chaos Working?
Anti-Hillary, Anti-Wright Takes Toll

* Confusionism: a more balanced nature than the heirarchy implied

! deluded Republicans (1st link, paragraph 2)

Footnotes Page Two JUNE 2014

Re:b.s.[!] (FP2)  Check Heading [i.e. (s.c.) FP2 above]
2B FP2 6-4-14
(hegel+popper) Too Random..., (fp1), Reigning Wags and Tales., Knot 2B3, (fp2,11-13).
(maslow+needs) Maslow Search , TruthOut.org
(heirarchy) Intelligence Gathering, Battle of Amendments?, C. BLANK NETWORK, D. Ditto Heads Unite!, Post-Pyth?.
Speaking of Rhodes. (It was under my radar)

BLANK NETWORK

Dot Tool* to be named later. This is just a list of the Wills and Bills.
[Not Necessarily the News Guru, but divagation or not maybe linked.]

The Anti-Billy Club
The Club of Association
King of Rhetoric?
A Generous dia-Gnosis.
Report from Sabbatical
Sabbatical

This is not necessarily a Newshounds blog, Colbert Report or Daily Show.
I don't read or view things so you don't have to, sometimes you do, and sometimes just scrolling over may provide enough. It is divagation and stochastic at its best, or sometimes worst. But it is not just all about them or us. My Navigation label needs updating, and the Navigation II label is about our course, or a combination or demonstration of it.

While names are not the thing(and they are coming slowly today), there is value in comparing and contrasting, and sometimes associations matter. Leadership and representation matters, and in journalism there is the ledership which sometimes leads back to my point: our headings, navigation and having to follow for oneself. Part of the spirit of this has been diffused in all seriousness, by the focus on the list and the Bills and Wills, but it is more about the network and bringing things to the table. So while the banner or name for the effort is still pending, as well as more on the principles(The club of association) I will begin listing the inspirations for the columns or sides of the table.

* Blank Network (Anti-Billy Club: see links)

RESEARCH (So I am frackin' fudging a bit with the Will, the HasselB, and the Williams.)
Bill O'Reilly
George F. Will
Elizabeth HasselBECK
William Kristol
Walter Williams
William Safire
Willam F. Buckley

DEVELOPMENT
Bill Maher
Will Rogers
Bill Press
William Shakespeare


Similar Wills
Rush Limbaugh
Glenn Beck
Steve King
Sarah Palin
Michele Bachmann

Honorary Anti-Billy Clubs
Noam Chomsky
Thom Hartmann
Rachel Maddow
Jon Stewart
Steven Colbert
Lawrence O'Donnell
Norman Goldman
Ed Schultz



[Under-construction, italics are postumous honors. Apologies for the orders, they are at my whim or some consideration or other. It is not about heirarchy or honors, or just Bill O'Reilly and Bill Maher. And it may be asked, do some really want to be at the table? If they don't work well with others? That may play out as the list and the principles evolve.(Network Theory)]
[2-17-11 Update: Walk Like A Cheesehead. Wrap mine in tinfoil..PU! NOT! But close enough to government work.]

Post-Pyth?

Logical Positivism?
Chomsky's Poker? 



source of link needed
arrow of time?














Inspiration Hegel: 
L P above?  Vienna Circle another D?
The following are unread yet representative sources
L P, ironically LW, Pop/per*, Chomsky

(ironically or logically? v.c.? )
A. B. C. D?

Chomsky? Heirarchy? Parsing? Sch^ ?

Chomsky may be the point [!]
x, y, z ?
OW !



[Note: Facetious* Time Stamp 2014]




* [!] (~)
12-2-14
 War on Hillary[!] A. The Un-Revolved(~) Thread  B. AsIMovian Principles. C. (fp2)

Culture 10 Files

From the Ship of Foils[!]

Rhetorical lede or ship?
The daily dot[?] http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/donald-trump-drags-mark-zuckerberg-into-immigration-fight/ar-CCLMb?ocid=OIE9HP
Frank ‘n Stein? 
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/trending/tt-BBlSteL?q=rene%20anand%20brain&form=PTTWNE&ocid=OIE9HP

Amazon dot culture?
Bridging the Law of Un-intended Consequences.
Pay more, search local[?]

... 
Corporations are not evil. 

What is evil?  Lack of or misuse of goods.  The lack of nexus between Adam Smith’s two tomes.  People as goods.  Lack of Maslow’s Mitt Flop!  (Heirarchy of Needs.)   
Or TE HE…